<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Study Part 2 &#8211; Continuing the Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/2009/twitter-study-continuing-the-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/2009/twitter-study-continuing-the-conversation/</link>
	<description>Pear Analytics - home of the free SEO analysis tool and website analyzer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Madhu Kopparam</title>
		<link>http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/2009/twitter-study-continuing-the-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-5799</link>
		<dc:creator>Madhu Kopparam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pearanalytics.com/?p=905#comment-5799</guid>
		<description>Whatever happened to the continuation of this study? It will be interesting to find out where we are one year on. The October 2009 study itself doesn&#039;t seem to have seen the light of day, the links to Philtro and the analytics page don&#039;t seem to be working. 
I&#039;m in the industry myself but am very sceptical about this entire social media business...I see it as a self-consuming thing which currently beats trends because of the entire Facebook phenomenon but will it stand the test of time and still be there after &#039;fatigue&#039; sets in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to the continuation of this study? It will be interesting to find out where we are one year on. The October 2009 study itself doesn&#8217;t seem to have seen the light of day, the links to Philtro and the analytics page don&#8217;t seem to be working.<br />
I&#8217;m in the industry myself but am very sceptical about this entire social media business&#8230;I see it as a self-consuming thing which currently beats trends because of the entire Facebook phenomenon but will it stand the test of time and still be there after &#8216;fatigue&#8217; sets in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twitter tools</title>
		<link>http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/2009/twitter-study-continuing-the-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>twitter tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pearanalytics.com/?p=905#comment-577</guid>
		<description>I think id like to review this tool, you should contact me on my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think id like to review this tool, you should contact me on my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephendann.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/2009/twitter-study-continuing-the-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephendann.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pearanalytics.com/?p=905#comment-550</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Pear Necessities: Pear Analytics&#8217;s Pointless Babble Beta needs more work...&lt;/strong&gt;

I was raiding the Pear Analytics Website for the reference to their initial report, and I noticed they&#8217;ve upgraded to have a brand spanking new Beta(TM)  Feature &#8211; the PointlessBabble Filter so we can see just how what counts as pointless b...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Pear Necessities: Pear Analytics&#8217;s Pointless Babble Beta needs more work&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I was raiding the Pear Analytics Website for the reference to their initial report, and I noticed they&#8217;ve upgraded to have a brand spanking new Beta(TM)  Feature &#8211; the PointlessBabble Filter so we can see just how what counts as pointless b&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/2009/twitter-study-continuing-the-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pearanalytics.com/?p=905#comment-399</guid>
		<description>We wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.randomlyaccessed.com/article/pear-analytics-talks-about-its-twitter-study&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;news article&lt;/a&gt; about this.
Nice to see some response, and I really look forward to seeing the next set of results in October!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We wrote a <a href="http://www.randomlyaccessed.com/article/pear-analytics-talks-about-its-twitter-study" rel="nofollow">news article</a> about this.<br />
Nice to see some response, and I really look forward to seeing the next set of results in October!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

