Blog

Get a free website analysis and make sure Google likes you. No signup, no email to give, nothing to install.

If you’re trying to rank higher on search engines, it’s probably a good idea to not overload your site with Flash.  While there have been strides by the search engines to parse Flash files and grab the readable text, unless you set this up properly, chances are the Flash will end up hurting your rankings.

When to use Flash

Flash is a great tool if you have a complicated product that needs more explanation or if you need entertainment value on the website.  Secondly, with the increase in mobile internet use, Flash is still not visible on the latest iPhone and Blackberry, so it’s likely those visitors will be bouncing.  At Pear, we’re getting about 20% of our visitors from mobile devices, so you could be losing out on those visitors with a Flash landing page.

Alternative solutions to Flash

But now we can use AJAX and other javascript techniques, like sliders and expanders, to uniquely display content without bombarding the visitor with content, and yet it’s all still readable by the search engine.  Check out how ServerBeach, a dedicated hosting company, uses javascript sliders instead of Flash to nicely organize lots of information.

Setting up proper use of Flash

If you or your developer still insist on using Flash, there are some ways that you can set up your code to optimize it for SEO, and it has to do with accessibility programming.  This blog post by Jonathan Hochman is a great overview of the multiple ways you can set this up using SWFObject 2.0, or even SIFR in some cases, although I understand SIFR is more used for typography enhancements, where you would like to use a non-standard web font, but get credit for the text in an H1 tag for example.

The SWFObject method provides a way to include alternate HTML content on the page which is visible in your source code, and all it uses is a tiny javascript file.  This stems from the Web Accessibility Initiative which says all multimedia content should have an alternative way of accessing the content.

Sharing is Caring:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Related Posts:

10 Responses

  1. Goalranks
    April 19th, 2010 at 9:20 am

    More seo business now, and also more competition. thanks for sharing

  2. Lovers
    May 3rd, 2010 at 11:03 pm

    Itlook like you take a lot time to update your blog, cos I found your blog is very useful to me.

  3. Orlando Neihoff
    May 19th, 2010 at 8:29 am

    I found your article very thought provoking. The way it was written made me look at things from a different angle and think about what I originaly thought, why not visit us :-) .I will definately be back again.

  4. Agata Morawska
    May 26th, 2010 at 11:18 am

    Very good primer on the subject and should help many businesses better understand SEO. I will be recommending it.

  5. Tony Hulls
    June 28th, 2010 at 6:08 am

    I think flash isn’t bad for websites, what’s bad is the lack of anything else. Flash is perfect for integration into a website, I just wouldn’t want to have one purely based on flash…at least not if SEO is important for that site.

  6. Ryan Kelly
    June 29th, 2010 at 10:06 pm

    Good point, Tony. We still see a lot of sites that use Flash improperly by not having alternate content, or having little or no HTML on the page as well. Advanced site owners and developers can use Flash properly and still maintain good SEO value.

  7. Rudolph Atkins
    July 15th, 2010 at 5:37 am

    Yeah, it is hard to make a flash website and mantain good SEO value in the same time

  8. Ryan Kelly
    July 23rd, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    @Rudolph I think if the developer sticks to the standards for handicap accessibility, you can generally make Flash more SEO friendly.

  9. alter ego
    July 25th, 2010 at 6:22 am

    Nice article Ryan! I found another one –> http://www.wow.gr/acceleratesuccess/2010/07/seo-flash/ that explains how you can make Flash sites Google friendly. Do you think that the solution they describe works?

  10. csp
    July 28th, 2010 at 2:30 am

    Thank you very much .

Leave a Reply